Borrowing Trouble

“… instead of celebrating the storied life of a great American woman, the left has chosen to bemoan the fact that the seat vacated by Justice Ginsberg will be filled with a man or woman nominated by the worst human being to ever walk the face of the earth … Donald Trump.”

Ruth Bader GinsbergI remember well the morning of November 9, 2016. My Facebook feed was blowing up with the mournful cries of “What will we tell our children?” and “Our sense of safety and security has been destroyed!” The left lost their collective minds and began marching in the streets, demanding that the newly elected president resign immediately since he didn’t at the time—nor would he ever be—fit to hold public office. He was a homophobe, a racist, a misogynist, a xenophobe, and just an all-around bad man. World War III was imminent! LGBTQ communities would be forced back into the closet! Black people would be relegated to pre-Civil War status! The whole world was going to end!

Yet, here we are. The bad man is still in office, and none of that stuff happened. No wars, no diminished rights, no retroactive slavery. But that doesn’t stop the left from borrowing trouble.

Because that’s what they do to stay relevant.

One of the most well-respected, hardworking, and trailblazing members of the judiciary passed from this life into the next. The Honorable Ruth Bader Ginsberg, notable member of the Supreme Court from 1993 until her death yesterday, did more for gender equality and women’s rights than any other former or present-day member of the Supreme Court. Her resume is beyond impressive, her work ethic unparalleled, and her ability to forge ahead under extreme duress is nothing short of remarkable.

But instead of celebrating the storied life of a great American woman, the left has chosen to bemoan the fact that the seat vacated by Justice Ginsberg will be filled with a man or woman nominated by the worst human being to ever walk the face of the earth … Donald Trump.

Oh, the humanity.

Here are two arguments against the left’s disproportional reaction:

  1. Had Justice Ginsberg felt that her successor should be a person nominated by a sitting president with a ‘D’ after his or her name, she would have resigned during the Obama administration so he could have replaced her with a like-minded jurist. She was battling health problems even then, and if her motive was to keep the court on the left side of things, she would have bowed out. As it stands, she remained on the bench, possibly because she is more knowledgeable about constitutional law than 99.9% of the American citizenry.
  2. As part of that American citizenry, if you or any of your comrades on the left were slobbering in your own drool during your ninth-grade U.S. government class, you probably remain unaware that there are three branches to our federal government—executive, legislative, and judicial, each designed to balance the laws that promote a democratic society and uphold the Constitution. Checks and balances … ring a bell?  Ruth knew the judicial branch was only one leg of the three-legged stool; ergo, she chose to remain on the bench, knowing that her “spot” would be vacated and subsequently filled on her terms. Truthfully? Whoever Mr. Trump nominates to fill her vacant seat will, in all likelihood, not affect your life one iota.

(Quick quiz: Can you name all ___ justices of the Supreme Court?)

The bottom line is this: If you’re so fragile that the thought of President Trump nominating a conservative judge to replace The Honorable Ruth Bader Ginsberg has completely ruined your life (much like your 2016 reaction to the election of President Trump), you probably need to reevaluate your priorities in terms of what you choose to get twisted up about.

Instead, why not live your life emulating the strength and wisdom of a great American? Hell’s bells, there’s a lot more you can do within your community to preserve your life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. I may not have agreed with her on all her opinions, but I certainly admire the path she forged for me, my daughters, and my future granddaughters.

Stop borrowing trouble.

 

 

 

A victory for women?

Abortion has become the scepter of the feminist, the talisman against oppression and male dominance, the badge of honor of the progressive left.

Hillary Clinton gleefully and smugly called it a “… victory for women!” Yesterday, SCOTUS ruled to strike down a Texas law requiring abortion clinics to become safer (thereby holding them to somewhat higher standards than a CVS Minute Clinic), calling it an “undue burden” for women.   Yes, according to the Democratic nominee for President of the United States, it is a victory for women that abortion clinics do not have to rise to the same standards as a facility where one might have their wisdom teeth removed.

Only we’re not talking about removing wisdom teeth, and therein lies the bigger issue.

The reason for the court’s ruling?  Should the Texas law have remained in effect, a number of sub-standard abortion facilities in the Lone Star state would have had to either be closed or refurbished to meet the higher standards of care—much like a hospital.  Physicians performing abortions would be required to have privileges at nearby hospitals in cases where complications may arise.  All of this regulation would, according to SCOTUS, make it more difficult for women to access health care.

I call bullshit.

The law would have limited the number of abortions in the state of Texas, so by striking down the legislation, SCOTUS has effectively sanctioned more abortions.  Obviously it’s not women they care about, it’s the issue of abortion.  Abortion has become the scepter of the feminist, the talisman against oppression and male dominance, the badge of honor of the progressive left.  They don’t care to know how the actual surgical procedure is carried out, nor do they concern themselves with the moral, ethical, or spiritual implications of abortion itself—no, what’s more important to them are the memories of their bygone struggle to attain and their present commitment to maintain the right of a woman to have an unborn baby viciously sucked out of her uterus.  It’s never been about women’s health care.

A victory for women?  Hardly.  A victory for the progressive left?  Absolutely.

Worst of all, a sad, tragic reminder that there remains a sector of our society that simply does not value life.

Sidebar:  For those conservatives who have decided not to vote in November because Donald Trump doesn’t fit into their milquetoast ideology of what a Republican nominee should look like, understand that the next president will most likely be nominating 3-4 justices for the Supreme Court.  Do you really want Hillary Clinton to be making those choices for you?